Whether you're new to climate topics or an expert you are most welcome. Before you can comment you'll need to register or sign in. Click one of the buttons below.
Whether you're new to climate topics or an expert you are most welcome. Before you can comment you'll need to register or sign in. Click one of the buttons below.
Comments
so essentially they (Josh et al) are simply building a "global" temperature reconstruction using cherry-picked and ridiculously localised data
which obviously then leads to wild ups and downs in the temperature (no sh1t Sherlock) - which then suggest hyper global climate sensitivity, which they also deny
whereas the original cartoon uses data from scientific papers that use global temperature reconstructions
is that the gist?
as an interesting aside - and I have noticed this a few times recently in the comments on denier blogs, that as the science and data moves ever farther away from their lunacy they are increasingly finding themselves at variance with people they once agreed with
XKCD Comic – I used to really enjoy that but now….
Brian Cox – I used to like him but now …
Bill Nye - Great when I was young but now ……
The New Scientist – Used to be concerned with science but now……
Neil deGrasse Tyson – ditto
You wonder when will they realise it is not the above who have suddenly rejected science but them